DHEA is often referred to as the "parental" or "base" hormone since after being first converted to the hormone androstenedione it is then further changed into the sex hormones testosterone and estrogens http://www.webmd.com/vitamins-supplements/ingredientmono-331-DHEA.aspx?activeIngredientId=331&activeIngredientName=DHEA
In the link http://www.food.ca/content/view/702/302/ Dr. Michael Colgan and others discuss not only why the action that the Canadian Government has placed on DHEA by adding it to the restricted list but also the role DHEA plays in preventing obesity and muscle loss. He recommends that the elderly should receive dietary supplements to achieve a plasma level equivalent to that of a 30 year old and strongly urge the government to reconsider removing its band. I too also think its unfortunate that the government has placed this drug on the restricted list. This restriction discourages DHEA research in the field of anti-aging ( Life Extension )specifically but also as a biological marker - a plasma test- for aging.
I can't recall the exact reference but in the 1980-90s biogerontologists had found that those patients who where near death from supposidly "natural causes" that their plasma DHEA levels were less than 500 ng/ml. Considering DHEA's important role in cell division (we produce over 300 billion new cells each day) it is tempting to postulate that these low levels may actually be the cause of death ! More importantly lets suppose that researchers designing life extension experiments found that the level of plasma DHEA remained high only in those octogenarians and other elderly whom they found were clinically to be much younger than expected for their chronological age (viz. from biological markers tests of aging ,viz. FeV1, Glucose tolerance, Creatine clearance, etc. Yes maybe plasma DHEA concentration tests could not only become a biological standard marker or test for aging that their life extension experiments are working. Could then be on the verge for finding the fountain of youth?
I would strongly recommend that our governments review (and maybe also our scientists engaged in anti-aging or life extension research, read this somewhat provocative link
No comments:
Post a Comment